Special Agent Joseph
Ziegler joins us now.
Thanks so much for being here.
We appreciate it.
Let me start with
just the big picture here.
What is your main
allegation
you're making about this investigation
into Hunter Biden?
Well, I wanted to thank you so much
for having me on your show.
I think it's important
that your audience hears essentially what
I presented facts
yesterday in my testimony.
So my main allegation
is the equitable treatment of taxpayers.
We have to treat every taxpayer
the same in investigating our cases
with the Department of Justice.
And I think that's important
that everyone understands that
that that to have a fair justice system,
we need to treat people the same.
It doesn't matter
what your political beliefs are.
Does it matter how much money you have?
Everyone should be treated the same.
Right.
And the suggestion is that Hunter
Biden was given special treatment
and the U.S.
attorney did not
go proceed
as aggressively
as he would have had Hunter Biden
been someone else.
So, David Weiss, as you know, the U.S.
attorney, said
in a letter
to Judiciary Committee Chairman
Jim Jordan, quote,
I've been granted ultimate authority
over this matter,
including responsibility
for deciding where, when
and whether to file charges.
I read that earlier.
It wasn't just in this letter.
He said it multiple letters.
Do you think he's not telling the truth?
So it's not
I don't know his intentions
with what he stated there.
But what I can tell you is the facts.
I know based on conversations
I had with a signed prosecutors,
that he went to the the Washington D.C.
U.S.
attorney's office
bringing the case there.
They told him no.
He had two reasons
he wanted to charge
Hunter Biden here in D.C.
I mean,
so he wanted to bring the case there
in D.C.
to charge for the 2014
and 2015 tax years.
They told them no.
And I think it's important
that in his letter,
he said that his authority is
geographically restricted
to the district of Delaware.
And if he needs to go outside of that,
he needs to ask to partner
with these other U.S. attorney's offices.
And if they say no,
then he needs to ask for that
special attorney authority.
And he was assured
that is not counsel authority.
No. He says special attorney authority.
And I think it's important
that you understand
that they haven't turned over a document
that says, here's
the letter where we gave him
the special attorney authority.
And all we're trying to do is say that if
if this were anyone else,
if this were Joe Joe taxpayer,
he would be getting
a much different treatment
than what was at place here.
Well, you're saying that
there would be other charges
in other jurisdictions.
Is that is or
is that what I'm taking from this?
So the prosecutors assigned to this case,
because he was charged,
I mean, he did have a plea agreement.
And I mean,
he is going to go before a judge.
I mean, it's not like he's
not facing anything.
I'm not excusing it, but I'm just saying
there are these allegations
and he is going to face
a courtroom proceeding, etc..
So the for sign prosecutor of the case
agreed with recommending
felony and misdemeanor
tax charges for Hunter Biden.
David Weiss also agreed with that.
And I know that from a meeting
that I had with him
in late August, early September.
And on top of that, you have
David Weiss essentially
So they all agreed to charging this
the felony, a misdemeanor.
So DOJ, DOJ policy on this
is that their tax policy
is that
if you have a felony with a misdemeanor,
you have to charge the felony,
and that's to prevent
an equitable treatment of taxpayers.
And they didn't do
that is what you're saying.
And according to the charging document,
they only charge two misdemeanors.
And one of those tax is related to 2018.
So let me just give you an opportunity
to respond to some of the things
that Democrats
on Capitol Hill are saying.
First of all, they're saying
why would a Trump appointed U.S.
attorney David Weiss lie?
So I have no idea what his what
his motives or what his beliefs are.
All I can do
is present the facts to Congress,
and it's for them to determine
and the American people
and the administration
to make
the proper decision
on how to move forward.
So let me ask you another question.
So you're a 13 year veteran of the IRS,
is that correct? I am. Okay.
Is this the most high profile,
most potentially politically
sensitive case you've ever
you've ever worked on?
Yeah, I would say so.
And when you say
that you saw abnormalities in this case,
like what other cases
are you comparing it to?
Just the normal Joe taxpayer case.
So I'm actually working
an even bigger case than this.
Not as sensitive as this,
but an even bigger case in this.
And I can tell you, the assigned
prosecutors in that case
has not acted anywhere near
what we were going through,
being constantly hamstrung
not following normal process.
The storage unit location
that we wanted to do
the search warrant on.
I think that it's important
for people
to understand that we had a plan
to move forward
Even David Weiss agreed with that plan.
But then they were at the same time
telling defense counsel
that we know about this storage unit
and that you need
to turn over the record.
So we were relying on him and his counsel
to turn over those records
to the government
vaults versus us going in
and getting those records.
So another
you testified yesterday
you wanted to interview President Biden's
grandchildren, Hunter's grown,
grown children.
They're adults,
but you were told, no, you couldn't
Even without those
interviews,
you still had enough
evidence, in your view
to recommend charges
because he was deducting things
related to them
that he what
he wouldn't be allowed to
to deduct in his taxes. Right.
I mean,
so you already knew
the crime had happened. You didn't.
The argument would be
you don't need to talk to us
to Hunter's adult children.
You already have the evidence
that what he did was wrong.
So tell me why why
that's not a satisfactory answer.
So when we work our tax cases
and it's an expense
that is deducted
for as a business expense
on someone's tax return,
you have to essentially
they're presumed that
that's a business expense
until you prove that it's not.
So part of it is going to the third party
to get those records. That's one step.
And then interviewing that person
to determine why was that?
Why was that expense made?
And then a lot of times
those witnesses could lead you
to other things
that could lead you
to other evidence expenditures
that it might have
that might have been made
related to them.
So obviously, it's
a politically sensitive case.
And I don't disagree with you
that theoretically everybody's
should be treated equally before the law
and in investigations like this.
One question I have is,
and because we hear Democrats
saying this,
that you and Shapley have not produced
any evidence of criminality
by President Biden,
is that when they say
that, is that correct?
So what I can tell you
and what we stated yesterday
we are working with the House Ways
and Means.
We are to get President Biden's taxes.
No, it's
we are working with the House Ways
and Means to any records
that Congress has asked
for related to this investigation.
We are working through the process.
They can vote
on whether or not to release
those to the full Congress.
And that's the process
that is a part of being a whistleblower.
So this was cited
and you were called before the committee
because they're talking about the House
Republicans are saying
that the federal government
has been
weaponized against conservatives
and Republicans.
They give any number of examples
of there
being very aggressive
treatment of Republicans
and in their view
and their characterization.
Kid glove treatment for Democrats
You are a self-described Democrat.
You worked at the IRS for 13 years.
Is that an accurate
description based on
what you've witnessed in those 13 years?
So I'm not going to speak
to the weaponization of of the government
because I don't think that's appropriate
for me.
I'm just going to present the facts
as I know them.
I think one of the big things
that I mentioned yesterday was
we need to have an independent attorney
with authority
to come in here
and see
and make sure that things
were done correctly. To the law.
And I think it's important
that there
there may be ancillary offshoot
cases from this that are sensitive,
that need to be investigated
it appropriately,
that may not have venue in Delaware.
So we don't run into that
same exact problem.
And that's
all I'm trying to say
is that we need to have someone in there
to look at that.
Do you know of criminal charges
against Hunter Biden that were not filed
that definitively?
There is evidence, proof
that they should be filed, that
he should be facing justice for.
So, again,
meeting with
the attorney, assigned attorneys,
we all
and that included Department of Justice
tax attorneys
all agreed for felony and misdemeanor
tax charges
related to 20, 17 2018 and 2019.
I didn't see that in that
charging document
that was filed in Delaware.
And those charges
would have been for one undeclared income
so would have been a false return
tax charge.
So it's 70 2061 and a false
or I'm sorry tax evasion so 70 201.
So evading your income tax.
So you tell me
because you're the expert, not me.
Is it
not possible
that in the dealings
with the Hunter Biden attorneys
they just agreed, okay, we'll drop this
in exchange for a plea of guilty
because that does happen.
So I can tell you
there's a lot of cases around the U.S.
right now
where people are being charged with
both the felony and misdemeanor
and not having the felony dropped off.
So I think it's important
that it's in
the it's in the
it's in the tax manual, their policy
that states that if you have the felony
and you have the evidence there
and there is also a misdemeanor
you have to charge the felony
in order
to not have inequitable
treatment of taxpayers.
And so in your mind,
should Hunter Biden be sentenced to jail,
sentenced to prison
Is that what you think
justice would look like
based on the crimes committed?
So, again, I'm not here,
but about Hunter Biden.
I'm here about the bigger,
bigger picture of all of this.
I blew the whistle
because I saw an inappropriate things
being done throughout this investigation.
I brought facts.
I brought things that had happened
as I recalled them to Congress.
My supervisor,
Gary Shapley, did the same thing.
And I think it's important
for the American people
don't read our transcripts
to read the transcripts
because we did that under oath.
We can be
if we said something,
if we lied, willfully lied.
And that
that's so important
that read what we said
and you can determine for yourselves
one way or the other.
Do you think that it's possible that
because this was the president's son,
there were extra
sensitivities and extra protocols
because of that
that would have been extended
to an investigation
of a Republican president's son
or daughter as well.
But but
and since this is the highest
profile, biggest,
most sensitive
investigation you ever were part of,
you weren't used to that.
But that really is
just generally
what happens
when it has to do with
any powerful family, any power.
And again, I'm not excusing it,
but I'm just saying, like,
I'm wondering
if this is just
how like
the DuPonts would be treated or,
you know, because you're from Delaware.
You know, I'm from Georgia. Okay.
But you're working in Delaware.
You know what I'm saying?
Like that
any powerful family might be treated
with kid gloves like this.
Again, I'm not saying that's right,
but that maybe that's what happened.
Yeah.
And and to that point,
I mean, I think it's important
that I understood
that it was a politically sensitive case.
I'm completely aware he was an attorney.
Records had to go through
a filter review.
So I'm completely aware
of all those problems.
And that's why
I think it's important
that we have an independent attorney
who has authority,
so a special counsel,
independent attorney
that can get in there
and make sure
that things are done correctly.
And that the
that the proper charges are brought
that would restore faith in our justice.
Well, I know it's
not an easy thing to be a whistleblower.
I know it's
not an easy thing to walk into the public
and say things like this
and you're going to be attacked.
You were attacked before by Trump, people
who thought that you were
you were part of a conspiracy
and likely you're going to be attacked
by the other side now.
Joseph Ziegler,
thank you so much for coming on the show.
We appreciate it.
Thank you so much for having me.
I really appreciate it.
0 Comments